song code here?
profile
journal
tagbox
misc
Hello, your disclaimer or whatsoever here :)
Blog stats? Etc.
Blog stats? Etc.
Profile
I'm sleeping and I love dreaming.
At vver eos et accusam dignissum qui blandit est praesent luptatum delenit aigue excepteur sint occae.
Et harumd dereud facilis est er expedit distinct.
Yoii rockem sockem mow-em yown. Manarie li que vaqeriao.
Occae et harumb bet theap. Est praesent luptatum.
Ha! Bis nostrud exercitation ullam mmodo consequet.
Duis aute in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Et harumd dereud facilis est er expedit distinct.
Yoii rockem sockem mow-em yown. Manarie li que vaqeriao.
Angels and Demons Movie [My Review]
Monday, May 25, 2009 , 2:02 PM
↑
Date: May 26, 2009
Time: 5:00 am
I just finished watching the movie and in my opinion, it sucks. I never appreciated movies who strays from the original plot. You may think that my reason is shallow, but yes. That's the reason why I think the movie sucks. Vittoria Vetra isn't the one who's supposed to discover Leornado Vetra's body but Maximilian Kohler. And the antimatter, it doesn't look like a dangerous object. In the movie it just looks like a canister whatchamalit. It was a bad decision for Dan Brown to sell the movie rights of his books. I mean look atThe Da Vinci Code , the movie sucks. And so is Angels and Demons.
I don't have a grudge on Tom Hanks, but he's not cut-out to play my Robert Langdon. [Yep, he's mine!] I mean, I imagined Robert to be a lot more older. I'd have to say Gary Oldman or Harrison Ford or Dan Brown himself! Yes, I'm picking old guys since Robert Langdon is 40+ people! But then, Hanks' portrayal of RObert Langdon is quite magnigicent. He's charming and relatable. He was able to talk us the ins and outs of the hunt.
Gah, anyway, back to the movie. The books has plenty of puzzles, and you need logic to solve them, which the movie lacks, BTW. The essence of the entire plot was lost. I mean, there's no thrill on the movie while Robert and Vittoria were on the hunt for the cardinals.
And the Hassassin, oh don't get me started on that. Robert was supposed to visit CERN first because that's where he'll learn about the Free fall tube that'll save his life when he jumps out of the plane! Argh! CERN DAMMIT!
Time: 5:00 am
I just finished watching the movie and in my opinion, it sucks. I never appreciated movies who strays from the original plot. You may think that my reason is shallow, but yes. That's the reason why I think the movie sucks. Vittoria Vetra isn't the one who's supposed to discover Leornado Vetra's body but Maximilian Kohler. And the antimatter, it doesn't look like a dangerous object. In the movie it just looks like a canister whatchamalit. It was a bad decision for Dan Brown to sell the movie rights of his books. I mean look at
I don't have a grudge on Tom Hanks, but he's not cut-out to play my Robert Langdon. [Yep, he's mine!] I mean, I imagined Robert to be a lot more older. I'd have to say Gary Oldman or Harrison Ford or Dan Brown himself! Yes, I'm picking old guys since Robert Langdon is 40+ people! But then, Hanks' portrayal of RObert Langdon is quite magnigicent. He's charming and relatable. He was able to talk us the ins and outs of the hunt.
Gah, anyway, back to the movie. The books has plenty of puzzles, and you need logic to solve them, which the movie lacks, BTW. The essence of the entire plot was lost. I mean, there's no thrill on the movie while Robert and Vittoria were on the hunt for the cardinals.
And the Hassassin, oh don't get me started on that. Robert was supposed to visit CERN first because that's where he'll learn about the Free fall tube that'll save his life when he jumps out of the plane! Argh! CERN DAMMIT!
Labels: Angels and Demons, Robert Langdon, stupid director, sucks
Tagboard
Tagbox code here :)Try to keep the width of your tagbox
at about 440px for near-perfection :)